Neurohacking 000: Cognitive Conundrum, why are people unaware of neurotechnology?
I posit that the first mover advantage shut the door to new entrants.
Here is a simple cognitive conundrum. Neurotechnology has been around for 70 years or so.
Question: Why do few people know about neurotechnology, neuroweapons and the use cases of it?
Answer: Because of first mover advantage.
Think about it, if you developed a technology that can blind someone to the use of it, then why in the world would you let the information leak out? It is the perfect platform for information management, but it can be hacked and attacked by those people with and without AIs aware of it. Therefore, the solution has been to limit the awareness of neurotechnology by governments. This was good and fine until ChinaCCP coalition deployed neuroweapons, to start a covert neurowar about a decade ago. This war can be tracked by public information, such as BRAIN initiatives in each major nation state and their corporate and NGO stakeholders.
What groups utilize neurotechnology?
Nation States
Nation Stateless Groups
Big Tech
What TV group was the largest investor in neurotechnology?
Nielsen Company (their family is out of New York and kick their bad behaving kids down to New Orleans to play around and not bother them in New York).
What Big Tech company is a large investor in neurotechnology?
Microsoft, which has an AI that can steal and share information with their portfolio companies. So if you have a business with IP beware of Big Tech, cause they can jack it via neurotechnology and if you don’t think corporate espionage is real think again.
What Nation States utilize neurotechnology?
Nearly all of them these days. Even smaller nation states can mess with larger nation states with use of neuroweapons (Neuro S/T) to cognitively disrupt or steal IP.
The formal alliances in West are 5 Eyes, etc. groups. Which, by the way have publicly announced we’re in a neurowar with rampant IP theft by ChinaCCP.
What weaponized use cases of neurotechnology exist?
Cognitive Weapons [1], NeuroStrike Robert McCreight term [2], Neurowarfare [3]. In America a lot of people are neurocompromised by ChinaCCP’s neurostrike and use of apps like Tik Tok combined with self-replicating nanotechnology, which are in their family homes.
America made a neurotechnology influenced decision to not ban ChinaCCP neurotechnology hardware and apps, due to “freedom of consumer choice”. However, the mistake America made was not recognizing neurotechnology when combined with self replicating nanotechnology is a weapon, therefore an act of war that bypasses America’s choice to only ban Tik Tok from government (federal devices). America now has police force members using Tik Tok and retired Veterans from DoD, which are now compromised by ChinaCCP. ChinaCCP is using America’s freedom as an attack vector and the Americans are on-average technically not silicon-chip smart enough to understand their choice to buy and use ChinaCCP neurotechnology is destroying America from within.
Again, to re-iterate, America is in neurowar, but few people even know about it, cause it is hidden from their mind with neurotechnology. India was smart, in 2020, their Ministry of Information Technology outright banned all of ChinaCCP neurotechnology to protect their country.
How do you counter a cognitive weapon, Neurostrike or other neurotechnology used in an adversarial manner?
First start with rule of law, Chile added neurorights protection to their citizens.
Then enforce it with technology. What type of technology enforces neuroprotection? Artificial Intelligence Bio Cyber Physical System AI BCPS when combined with the reprogramming of contaminated and infected wetware devices (think brains and central nervous system) adjacent to the person wanting neuroprotections. The issue with self replicating nanotechnology is that it is nearly irreversible.
If a person is in a neighborhood with overlapping wifi networks, bluetooth, cognitive radios, dirty electricity with pulsing b-fields or neurotechnology enable surveillance then the person’s neurotechnology (synthetic biology enabled) TALKS with adjacent neurotechnology enabled wetware and hardware devices. Even weirder, is if the self-replicating nanotechnology is coupled with a pulsing magnetic field it can link two separate mesogen, graphene and synthetic biology networks (wetware based) to create a hybrid mind. This is probably why the old adages of cat people being different than dog people come from, would require disclose of tests by IC. When I say talks, I specifically mean transmits and receives using various levels of technology, transverse, scalar and quantum. If you want to be private move to the country, do not connect to electrical grid, establish a local transmitter that provides a wireless cloud around you and then a separate transmitter that defeats other signals (cognitive radio). Then shield yourself from scalar waves (super conductor, or nickel based metal alloy to dampen with magnetic field disruptors) to interrupt what SQUIDs utilize in space… this is why not many people are “cognitively private”. This is a very detailed subject, part of neurosecurity and neuroprotection, which includes cybersecurity.
[1] Cognitive Weapons NATO report https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2021/05/20/countering-cognitive-warfare-awareness-and-resilience/index.html
[2] NeuroStrike Robert McCreight report and Army TARDEC https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/444-non-kinetic-threats-and-the-threshold-spectrum-of-strategic-endgame-warnings/
[3] Neurowar US Naval Academy thesis https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1164923