Neurohacking, Cybersecurity, Bioenergetics & Biotechnology 101: anti-CRISPR to reverse Neuro S/T genetic weapons
Within the current Neuro S/T war there is a need to "protect the genome", which is augmented through synthetic biology as "bridge" while underlying biological system is repaired from gene damages.
The best way to view this concept is that our genomes are hackable now at the biological level as well as with synthetic biology interconnects.
How can one protect a human body from intentional genomic damage, while enabling the body to continue to work for the person without taking the person offline for too long? The use of synthetic biology as an overlay, bridge, to enable continued human body operation, while the underlying biological genome is repaired and healed with “anti-CRISPR” based technologies is an extremely promising strategy. This strategy works, if there isn’t a competition between “seeds” of synthetic biology: mesogens: nemetic crystals within the person’s body.
Therefore, one of the possible root sources of Unconventional Brain Injury UBI after a persons’ synthetic biology is intentionally destroyed through use of a Neuro S/T agent is “seed” competition, which directly interacts with “the vacuum” and into 3D space and time and limits mass-transfer access for anti-CRISPR based genomic repairs to the person.
So, when we talk about “Neurowar is here” [3] it is here at many levels, the expression of the integrated biology and synthetic biology, the building of the synthetic biology overlay and then the damages wreaked through gene based weapons on the human. "Seeds” can be updated across time and 3D space, through “the vacuum” and use of on body scalar can speed up the healing of damage to the body at cellular level. However, if the genomic repair “anti-CRISPR” technology can’t physically access via mass transfer the areas required for recovery due to blockage by “adversarial” synthetic biology and “seeds” then the genomic repair strategy fails to homogeneously repair and recover the damaged genome, let alone tissues.
“MIT Technology Review identified laboratories that are working to find “anti-CRISPR” molecules: proteins in nature that can “turn off” CRISPR-induced gene edits.14 Such endeavors reflect steps to control open source research and deter the use of gene editing to produce biological weapons or agents that otherwise negatively affect global health.” [2]
So, the Neuro S/T battle for the mind and body is at the genomic level, synthetic biology level and also at the “seed” level which stretches through time via use of “the vacuum” and 3D space. Where we have an interaction of “seed” build-out growth from competing AI BCPS systems or an AI BCPS system competing against a Neuro S/T agent that is designed to block and restrict mass transfer, NeuroStrike [4], for gene based repairs, through gene drives or other mechanisms. This is where the Rife frequencies come in handy to break-up adversarial synthetic biology, which then enables one to get to their root “seeds” for removal through chelation over time before they can re-grow adversarially again. This is in addition to “disconnects” where the mesogen: nemetic crystals are de-linked from their source transmitters.
The repair of a human body through use of scalar waves is within the field of bioenergetics. I am not 100% confident that it wipes out prior “seeds” as its’ starting point for repair when on body was after the adversarial “seed” was non-invasively dosed. This is an area open for active review in my mind, which is not as experienced as others in this space.
In my humble professional opinion, the above is why Unconventional Brain Injuries UBI and “Havana Syndrome” are so extremely difficult to reverse engineer as you have the literal use of a technology that alters your perception of reality, blocking what you need to do as an engineer to help someone, when tackling the repair of a person from within an active “NeuroStrike” front that clouds ones’ judgement e.g. OODA loop.
List of References
[1] MIT Technology Review
[2] PRISM Vol. 8, No. 3
[3] https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1164923.pdf
[4] https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/444-non-kinetic-threats-and-the-threshold-spectrum-of-strategic-endgame-warnings/