Experiment 101: Synthetic Biology, Heavy Metal Poisoning & Graphene Oxide Detoxing R&D Experiment #1: Footbaths
Here is one of many methods to detox from a cognitive weapon system, removing the in-situ dosed portion. This is my personal R&D work, based upon literature review.
From what I’ve learned so far in this journey of recovering from a “cognitive weapon” failed hit job in New Orleans, LA in 2022, is that there are many methods to remove non-invasively dosed materials. One method that I’ve researched is a foot bath.
Summary of Footbaths from an Electrochemical Engineer
There are two primary types of footbaths, passive (no forcing current or emf in a single container for both feet) and active (forcing current and emf with two separate containers for each foot, separated by air or a membrane). Many people do not understand that a footbath is an electrochemical process, there are tons of junk items for sale that scam people with footbaths, it is all about ion transfer (electron and proton). If you are not familiar with electrochemical reactors (e.g. footbaths) or open battery systems then an electrochemistry book should be your first read to make an informed opinion or comment, else don’t waste anybody’s time providing feedback when you have not taken the time to learn about the underlying physics and electrochemistry involved.
For those who only value “credentials” or a track record in publications. Here is some of my electrochemical work, with the novel insight to adjust humidity to get the reaction to work, collaborating with some amazing researchers and scientists. I just have a couple of masters degrees as was working on a graduate to Ph.D. program in geochemistry before focusing on building Reactwell. These collaborators all have “union card” Ph.Ds and are good people. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsaem.2c02226
Here is what my footbath looked like after a week or so of utilizing it before I emptied it out, it was disgusting.
Here is what I put into the footbath for my own use (personal R&D) in detoxing from a failed “cognitive weapon” hit job.
Ingredients: Borax, Baking Soda, Epson Salt & Chlorine (swimming pool levels up to shock).
Over the past day after evaulating the results (qualitatively) cause my laboratory was disabled in 2022 due to a cognitive weapon failed hit job, rendering me fairly useless with respect to cognitive and physical abilities… took a full 11-12 months to recover to pre-cognitive weapon failed hit job and with near zero revenues, closed out the lease in full.
Here is the useful insight, based upon qualitative data from the spent footbath water. This synthetic biology stuff is all about charge, if someone has a ton of metals in them (mostly +1 to +2 then they can charge-up (e.g. bio capacitor) and disrupt a ton of natural biological functions that depend upon charge gradients in membranes.
So, what is able to be purchased for dirt cheap and has a negative charge? Chlorine found in bleach and swimming pools! Chlorine is Cl- so it can bind to metals and possibly some synthetic biology. If you have a reservoir of chlorine and boron with some soda to keep it basic, then perhaps the skin (which is in itself an organ that enables water hydration… I’ve always found it entertaining when people worry about filtered water, but yet take long showers in unfiltered water, where the skin soaks up the metals, chemicals, etc. like a sponge into the body anyway).
Next R&D experiment is to determine if a chlorine level (pool/tub) comparable to a swimming pool (safe proven levels), but also with boron and soda (need to verify chemical reactions with a base and chlorine per soda formulation (e.g. baking soda and others)). Perhaps this is a super simple solution to render and pull the synthetic biology and clotting materials out of the body without spending a fortune or in combination with chelators, such as Vitamin C and calcium-disodium-EDTA. Perhaps such combination of chlorine bath with boron and soda reduces the frequency of treatments for chelation, a hypothesis. Time and data will tell all truths, for now moving forward with a bath sized soak on a daily basis (morning/evening). The results (observable from the footbath are very telling, that something was being pulled out of the body. However, quantitative lab analysis on it needs to be conducted… so for now this is an online log book of my personal R&D, not advice to anyone.
Based upon the successful footbath experiment in 2023, reviewing “fancy” footbath systems that some friends of mine had purchased in the past without understanding the underlying physics. I’m going to put together a basic DIY footbath kit for anyone to build on their own or to purchase on a DIY R&D experiment. Cheers to 2024! Health, Wellness and Neuroawareness.
References: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41699-017-0041-3
This is a GREAT post, Brandon. I'm re-reading it now and have something to share.
You may already know that pool shock, also known as MMS2 in the MMS-Jim Humble-chlorine dioxide world, when taken internally, reduces to HOCL (hypochlorous acid). Your post prompted me to look in my voluminous files and found this on MMS2 (pool shock) with regards to degradation of graphene oxide. Forgive the length....
Check this article found in the Nature website: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41699-017-0041-3
"Hypochlorite degrades 2D graphene oxide sheets faster than 1D oxidised carbon nanotubes and nanohorns"
It says: "In this study, we aimed to further the current understanding of the fate of oxidised CNMs in an oxidative environment. We tested whether sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), colloquially known as bleach, was able to efficiently degrade GO flakes in suspension.
Comparing the chemical degradation of GO to that of two other oxidised CNMs, specifically carbon nanohorns (OxNH) and oxidised multiwall carbon nanotubes (OxMWNT), we reasoned that GO will degrade faster than the other two nanomaterials due to its unique physico-chemical features. NaClO was chosen since it is a commonly used chemical by the public and industry.
Moreover, hypochlorite (ClO−) is naturally produced in the human body by various enzymes, such as myeloperoxidase and eosinophil peroxidase. 19 It was our hypothesis that the strong oxidative action of ClO−, from NaClO, would induce oxidative damage to the graphitic backbone, ultimately degrading the nanostructures to various extents. The degradation processes mediated by ClO− were followed over a week using a battery of characterisation methods. These included visual observation, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), Raman spectroscopy, UV–Vis spectroscopy and Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FT-IR). The observations were compared against when the materials were incubated in water.
We found that incubation in NaClO induced severe structural modifications in GO that was consistent with the materials degradation. Over the course of a week, GO degraded more rapidly than OxNH or OxMWNT. The results of this study adds information to ratify a proposal we made in a previous report concerning the mechanism by which carbon-based nanomaterials may degrade under a strong oxidative environment. 13 , 20
More info:
EU has started a billion project the Graphene Flagship in 2013. The Graphene Flagship puts an article on their website: "Graphene oxide biodegrades with help of human enzymes"
In this article, it says:
"During the inflammation process, neutrophils, a subtype of white blood cells, gather at the infection site and secrete myeloperoxidase, which catalyses a chemical reaction with chloride ions and hydrogen peroxide to produce strong oxidants such as hypochlorous acid. These oxidants have antimicrobial qualities, and are also known to degrade polyester-based implants, extracellular sugars and oxidised carbon nanotubes.
The study authors suggest that the high redox potentials of oxidants produced in the myeloperoxidase-catalysed reaction could in a similar way degrade graphene oxide held in suspension. Material breakdown likely starts at the level of carbon atoms connected with oxygen in the graphene lattice, and central to this is the hypochlorous acid produced in the reaction. Surface electric charge is also thought to contribute, as it does in the case of oxidised carbon nanotubes, since it favours the strong binding of graphene oxide with the enzyme, and subsequently triggers its degradation."
END OF ARTICLE
Theoretically, according to Jim's book, myeloperoxidase (MPO) is a heme enzyme that uses hydrogen peroxide to oxidize chloride to hypochlorous acid. And we use MMS2 to acquire Hypochlorous acid, which means MMS2 will degrade the graphene oxide and help it out of human body.
What do you think?
What are the portions of Epsom salt borax, chlorine and baking soda? Do you get chlorine from industrial or Amazon?